Whose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Whose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements
Recent health policy in England has demanded greater involvement of patients and the public in the commissioning of health and social care services. Public involvement is seen as a means of driving up service quality, reducing health inequalities and achieving value in commissioning decisions. This paper presents a summary and analysis of the forms that public involvement in commissioning are t...
متن کاملWhose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning
AIM This paper aims to explore patient and public representation in a NHS clinical commissioning group and how this is experienced by staff and lay members involved. BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement is believed to foster greater public representativeness in the development and delivery of health care services. However, there is widespread debate about what representation is or what i...
متن کاملWhose voice? Whose choice? Whose power?
Coercion in psychiatry stems from the historic inequality between the psychiatrist and the person who is designated as the "patient," even though he/she may not have chosen this role, and may not see him/herself as needing psychiatric attention. The psychiatrist has the power to define an individual as mentally ill, and then to confine and treat the person based on that definition. The user/sur...
متن کاملGeneral practice commissioning: in whose interests?
Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England have awarded hundreds of contracts worth at least £2.4bn (€3.4bn; $3.7bn) to organisations in which their board members have a financial interest, a joint investigation by The BMJ and The Times has found. This new analysis shows the extent to which CCG boards have become conflicted under the health reforms introduced in 2012, which handed general ...
متن کاملWhose Copy? Whose Rights?
This is the third installment in a series of editorials on the implications of open-access publishing for established publishing practices and stakeholders in scientifi c and medical research. T he questions, tensions, and social concerns surrounding copyright and the Internet are very different for scientifi c and medical literature than for other kinds of easily reproducible digital works. Pe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Critical Public Health
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0958-1596,1469-3682
DOI: 10.1080/09581590802385672